LAMENT FOR A DESTROYED CITY IN THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF KYIVAN RUS’ (texts and contexts)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2026.03.14

Keywords:

Kyivan Rus’, literature, lament over the destroyed city, biblical-Byzantine manuscript tradition, «Sermon on Law and Grace», «Encomium to Volodymyr», Theotokos-Intercessor, Orant — Inviolable Wall, Cumanic raids, internecine strife, apocalyptic tension, divine punishment and mercy.

Abstract

Based on a source-analytical examination of written texts containing descriptions of the destruction of a medieval city, in this paper the author attempts to illuminate their cultural and symbolic content. The formation and embodiment, within the Kyivan Rus’ cultural tradition, of the idea of the Most Holy Theotokos’s merciful protection of the Christian city and its inhabitants is traced. In the Middle Ages, when the thinking and sensibility of contemporaries were permeated by profound pessimism and uncertainty about the future, trust in God’s mercy counterbalanced the rhythm of urban life — measured by everyday anxieties — which unfolded in a state of uneasy apprehension. The apocalyptic tension and eschatological disposition of Old Rus’ communities were further intensified by Polovtsian (Cumanic) raids and princely wars of successions. The destructive consequences thereof, as recorded in the chronicles, are framed by a series of biblical quotations and paraphrases, concealed allusions, and citations from translated Byzantine works. Within this corpus of reading, medieval Rus’ scribes, reflecting on Old Testament precedents, sought in the contemporary worldview the causes of calamity, grief, and lamentation. Such thematic content structured the dramaturgy of the Lament over the Destroyed City — most notably over Kyiv, which was positioned as the Second Jerusalem. Consequently, instances of Kyiv’s devastation and the abuse of its inhabitants, as recorded in the chronicles, were interpreted as a divine curse visited upon the capital of Rus’ in the same manner as had once befallen Jerusalem. The path to salvation, to the overcoming of apocalyptic tension and eschatological anxiety, was indicated to Old Rus’ communities by the Gospel commandments. It was paved by the practice of vigorous church construction, daily prayer, and liturgical observance. People lived in hope of God’s mercy. Such hope fills the Prayer to the Theotokos — Intercessor of Volodymyr Monomakh, included in the Tale of Bygone Years at the conclusion of the account of the Rus’-Cumanic wars of 1093—1096, which proved so destructive for Kyiv and other cities. The veneration of the Theotokos as Intercessor, which reached its apogee in the late eleventh and first third of the twelfth century, played a defining role in shaping the poetic-religious image of the Inviolable Wall. Given that the majority of Kyiv’s churches were dedicated to the Mother of God, the capital of Rus’ was perceived in the collective consciousness as a divinely chosen and divinely protected city — the City of the Theotokos. The idea of the Theotokos’s intercession as patroness of Kyiv found further development and material expression, manifest in the dense concentration of churches dedicated to her within the urban fabric. These included the Church of the Theotokos of the Blachernae Monastery at Klov, built in 1108, and the Church of the Theotokos Pyrogoshcha on the Podil, erected in the 1130s. It is for this reason that the Theotokos was conceived as the Heavenly Intercessor of Kyiv and of all Christians, identified with the idea of divine purity and holiness. The glory of her virginity functions here as a metaphor for the inviolability, sovereignty, and golden glory of the City under her patronage. It is from there — from «her city on high», that is, from Kyiv — that the Mother of God protects the entire Christian community of Rus’-Ukraine.

References

Averintsev, S. S. 1972. K uiasneniiu smysla nadpisi nad konkhoi tsentralnoi apsidy Sofii Kievskoi. In: Lazarev, V. N., Vagner, G. K., Ilin, M. A., Podobedova, O. I. (red.). Drevnerusskoe iskusstvo. Khudozhestvennaia kultura domongolskoi Rusi. Moskva: Nauka, s. 25-49.

Averintsev, S. S. 1973. Zoloto v sisteme simvolov rannevizantiiskoi kultury. In: Grashchenkov, V. N. i dr. (red.). Iuzhnye slaviane i Drevniaia Rus. Zapadnaia Evropa: Iskusstvo i kultura. Sbornik statei v chest V. N. Lazareva. Moskva: Nauka, s. 43-52.

Averintsev, S. S. 1999. Akafist. In: Averintseva, N. P., Sigov, K. B. (red.). Sergei Averintsev. Sobranie sochinenii. Kiev: Dukh i Litera, s. 39- 41.

Akentev, K. K. 1995. Mozaiki kievskoi sv. Sofii i «Slovo» mitropolita Ilariona v vizantiiskom liturgicheskom kontekste. In: Akentev, K. K. (red.). Liturgiia, arkhitektura i iskusstvo vizantiiskogo mira: Trudy XXIII Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa vizantinistov (Moskva, 8—15 avgusta 1991 g.) i drugie materialy, posviashchennye pamiati o. Ioanna Meiendorfa. Vizantinorossika: Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo obshchestva vizantinoslavianskikh issledovanii, 1. Sankt-Peterburg: Vizantinorossika, s. 76-94.

Aleksandrovych, V. 2010. Pokrov Bohorodytsi. Ukrainska serednovichna ikonohrafiia. Studii z istorii ukrainskoho mystetstva, 4. Lviv: Instytut ukrainoznavstva im. I. Krypiakevycha NAN Ukrainy.

Beletskii, A. A. 1960. Grecheskie nadpisi na mozaikakh Sofii Kievskoi. In: Lazarev, V. N. Mozaiki Sofii Kievskoi. Moskva: Iskusstvo, s. 159-192.

Bulgakov, S. 1927. Kupina neopalimaia. Opyt dogmaticheskogo istolkovaniia nekotorykh chert v pravoslavnom pochitanii Bogomateri. Parizh: YMCA Press.

Hrushevskyi, M. 1895. XII. Patriarkh Fotii. In: Hrushevskyi, M. Vyimky z zherel do istorii Ukrainy-Rusy: do polovyny XI vika. Lviv: Naukove tovarystvo imeni Shevchenka, s. 21-34.

Danilevskii, I. N. 1999. Mog li Kiev byt novym Ierusalimom? Odissei. Chelovek v istorii. Lichnost i obshchestvo: problemy samoidentifikatsii. 1998, s. 134-150.

Darkevich, V. P. 2000. «Gradskie liudi» Drevnei Rusi: XI—XIII vv. In: Koshelev, A. (sost.). Iz istorii russkoi kultury. I: Drevniaia Rus. Moskva: Iazyki russkoi kultury, s. 640-690.

Deivis, N. 2001. Yevropa: Istoriia. Kyiv: Osnovy.

Istrin, V. 1897. Otkrovenie Mefodiia Patarskogo i apokrificheskie videniia Daniila v vizantiiskoi i slaviano-russkoi literaturakh. Issledovanie i teksty. Moskva: Universitetskaia tipografiia.

Istrin, V. M. 1920. Knigi vremennye i obraznye Georgiia Mnikha: Khronika Georgiia Amartola v drevnem slavianorusskom perevode. Tekst, issledovanie i slovar. І: Tekst. Petrograd: Rossiiskaia gosudarstvennaia akademicheskaia tipografiia.

Kazakov, G. 1992. Sacrum imperium (kam telogiyata na imperatorskata vlast vav Vizantia). Medieavalia Ucrainica: Mentalnist ta istoriia idei, І, s. 3- 25.

Kanon… 1915. Kanon Velikii Andreia Kritskogo. Sankt-Peterburg.

Karpov, A. Iu. 2002. Eskhatologicheskie ozhidaniia v Kievskoi Rusi kontsa XІ — nachala XІІ v. Otechestvennaia istoriia, 2, s. 4-16.

Kolchin, B. A. (red.). 1985. Drevniaia Rus. Gorod, zamok, selo. Arkheologiia SSSR, XV. Moskva: Nauka, s. 298-363.

Kondakov, N. P. 1915. Ikonografiia Bogomateri. ІІ. Sankt-Peterburg: Imperatorskaia AN.

Kuza, A. V. 1989. Malye goroda Drevnei Rusi. Moskva: Nauka.

Kuza, A. V. 1996. Drevnerusskie gorodishcha Х—ХIII vv. Svod arkheologicheskikh pamiatnikov. Moskva: Khristianskoe izdatelstvo.

Labunka, M. 1990. Mytropolyt Ilarion i yoho pysannia. Pratsi Hrekokatolytskoi Bohoslovskoi Akademii, 80. Rym: Ukrainskyi Katolytskyi Universytet im. sv. Klymenta Papy.

Le Goff, Zh. 1992. Tsivilizatsiia srednevekovogo Zapada. Moskva: Progress-Akademiia.

Loviagin, E. 1861. Kanon Bozhiei Materi s Akafistom sv. Iosifa Pesnopevtsa. In: Bogosluzhebnye kanony na grecheskom, slavianskom i russkom iazykakh, perevedennye na russkii iazyk ordinarnym professorom Sankt-Peterburgskoi dukhovnoi akademii Evgrafom Loviaginym. Sankt-Peterburg: Sinodalnaia tipografiia, s. 164-190.

Loparev, Khr. 1915. Staroe svidetelstvo o polozhenii rizy Bogoroditsy vo Vlakhernakh v novom istolkovanii primenitelno k nashestviiu russkikh na Vizantiiu v 860 godu. Vizantiiskii vremennik, ІІ, s. 582-628.

Matveenko, V. A., Shchegoleva, L. I. (sost.). 2000. Vremennik Georgiia Monakha (Khronika Georgiia Amartola). Russkii tekst, kommentarii, ukazateli. Moskva: Bogorodskii pechatnik.

Milkov, V. V. 1999. Drevnerusskie apokrify. Pamiatniki drevnerusskoi mysli: issledovaniia i teksty, I. Sankt-Peterburg: Khristianskii gumanitarnyi institut.

Myshanych, O. V. (red.). 1989. Litopys ruskyi za Ipatskym spyskom. Pereklad L. Ye. Makhnovtsia. Kyiv: Dnipro.

Moldovan, A. M. 1984. «Slovo o Zakone i Blagodati» Ilariona. Kiev: Naukova dumka.

Moldovan, A. M. (red.). 2004. Istoriia Iudeiskoi voiny Iosifa Flaviia: Drevnerusskii perevod / Izd. podgot. A. A. Pichkhadze, I. I. Makeeva, G. S. Barankova, A. A. Utkin. І. Moskva: Iazyki russkoi kultury.

Nikolskii, A. I. 1906. Sofiia Premudrost Bozhiia (Novgorodskaia redaktsiia ikony i sluzhba Sv. Sofii). Vestnik arkheologii i istorii, izdavaemyi imperatorskim Arkheologicheskim institutom, XVII, c. 72-104.

Ousterkhaut, R. 2005. Vizantiiskie stroiteli. Kiev; Moskva: Korvin Press.

Panchenko, D. 2026. Literaturni oznachennia stepovykh narodiv u ruskii knyzhnosti domonholskoho periodu. Dopovid, vyholoshena na zasidanni Kyievo-Ruskoho seminaru Tsentru doslidzhen z istorii Kyivskoi Rusi Instytutu istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy 28 travnia 2026 r.

Pliukhanova, M. 1995. Siuzhety i simvoly Moskovskogo tsarstva. Sankt-Peterburg: Akropol.

Pliukhanova, M. B. 1997. O traditsiiakh Sofiiskikh i Uspenskikh tserkvei na russkikh zemliakh do XVI veka. Lotmanovskii sbornik, 2, s. 483-510.

Podskalski, G. 1996. Khristianstvo i bogoslovskaia literatura v Kievskoi Rusi (988—1237 gg.). Sankt-Peterburg: Vizantinorossika.

Poppe, A. 1995. O zarozhdenii kulta svv. Borisa i Gleba i o posviashchennykh im proizvedeniiakh. Russia Mediaevalis, VIII (1), s. 21- 68.

PSRL. 1926. Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopisei. ІІ: Lavrentevskaia letopis. 1: Povest vremennykh let. Leningrad: AN SSSR.

PSRL. 1927. Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopisei. ІІ: Lavrentevskaia letopis. 2: Suzdalskaia letopis po Lavrentevskomu spisku. Leningrad: AN SSSR.

PSRL. 2001. Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopisei. ІІ: Ipatevskaia letopis. Moskva: Iazyki russkoi kultury.

Rychka, V. M. 2005. «Kyiv — Druhyi Yerusalym». Z istorii politychnoi dumky ta ideolohii serednovichnoi Rusi. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy.

Rychka, V. M. 2013. Kyievo-Sofiiska «stina neporushna» (z istorii formuvannia suspilno-relihiinoi idei). In: Arkhypova, Ye. I., Ivakin, H. Yu. (red.). Khram i liudy. Zbirka naukovykh prats do 90-richchia z dnia narodzhennia Serhiia Oleksandrovycha Vysotskoho. Kyiv: TOV «Ahrar Media Hrup», s. 169-180.

Rychka, V. 2025. Kyivska Rus ta yii kolonii (prychyny i naslidky supernytstva). In: Smolii, V. (red.). Ukraina v heoprostori serednovichnoi i rannomodernoi tsyvilizatsii: Identyfikatsiini ta sotsiokulturni aspekty. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy, s. 30-57.

Sarabianov, V. D. 2008. Mozaicheskaia dekoratsiia Sofii Kievskoi: Vizantiiskaia formula v drevnerusskoi traditsii. Iskusstvoznanie, 2, s. 4- 36.

Taft, R. F. 2000. Vizantiiskii tserkovnyi obriad. Kratkii ocherk. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiia.

Tvorogov, O. V. 1975. Drevnerusskie khronografy. Leningrad: Nauka.

Tolochko, O. P. (red.). 2020. Halytsko-Volynskyi litopys. Tekstolohiia. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka.

Tolochko, P. P. 1989. Drevnerusskii feodalnyi gorod. Kiev: Naukova dumka.

Franklin, S., Shepard, D. 2000. Nachalo Rusi. 750—1200. Sankt-Peterburg: Dmitrii Bulanin.

Chekin, A. S. 2000. Bezbozhnye syny Izmailovy. In: Koshelev, A. (sost.). Iz istorii russkoi kultury. I: Drevniaia Rus. Moskva: Iazyki russkoi kultury, s. 691-716.

Shevchenko, I. 2001. Vladymyro-Suzdalske kniazivstvo yak supernyk ta epihon Kyieva. In: Shevchenko, I. Ukraina mizh Skhodom i Zakhodom. Narysy z istorii kultury do pochatku XVIII stolittia. Lviv: Instytut istorii Tserkvy Lvivskoi Bohoslovskoi Akademii, s. 61-74.

Gippius, A. 2003. Millennialism and Jubilee Tradition in Early Rus’: History and Historiography. Ruthenica, ІІ, p. 155-171.

Goltz, H. 1988. Der «Hymnos Akathistos» — eine Keimzelle russischer orthodoxer Spiritualität. In: Felmy, K. Ch. et al. (eds.). Tausend Jahre Christentum in Russland: Zum Millennium der Taufe der Kiever Rus’. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, s. 773-801.

Mango, C. 1958. The Homilies of Photius, Patriarch of Constantinople. Dumbarton Oaks Studies, 3. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Vasiliev, A. A. 1946. The Russian Attack on Constantinople in 860. Cambridge, Mass.: Mediaeval Academy of America.

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Rychka, V. (2026). LAMENT FOR A DESTROYED CITY IN THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF KYIVAN RUS’ (texts and contexts). Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, (3(60), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2026.03.14