NATURAL PIGMENTS IN MATERIALS OF THE MULTILAYERED MOUSTERIAN SITE OF PROLOM II


  • V. M. Stepanchuk Institute of Archaeology, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
  • O. I. Nezdolii Institute of Archaeology, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
  • D. O. Vietrov Institute of Archaeology, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Keywords: Crimea, Middle Palaeolithic, Neanderthals, natural pigments, ocher, non-utilitarian activity.

Abstract

Assemblages of discovered in 1973 by Yu. G. Kolosov and between 1977 and 1985 investigated by the directed by him Crimean Palaeolithic expedition of IA AN USSR the multilayered Mousterian site of Prolom II contain a comparatively large series of fragments of ocher. The undertaken study of morphological features, traces of artificial transformation, the supposed signs of use on given objects, allows us to formulate the following. Spatial distribution of findings over the site area seems to reveal the gravitation towards the back area of shelter, but this pattern can be distorted due to the incompleteness of data on the exact position of objects found in course of the recent years of excavation. The most probable source of origin of the material in the collection was river alluvium. This is evidenced by the shape of many objects (small pebbles), and, possibly, by scratches and other damage to surfaces. It is possible, however, that some of the surface damage (scratches, incisions, hollows) is of anthropogenic origin. A significant part of fragments, 30 of the available 44, are either products of intentional breaking (crushing), or bears the marks of splitting, flaking and retouching. Part of objects has intensely polished areas, which appeared, it is not excluded, as a result of use.

Finding natural pigments in the context of the cultural layer of European Middle Palaeolithic sites has traditionally been associated with non-utilitarian activities of the Neanderthals. The revision of materials of Prolom II revealed quite numerous ocher finds in several Middle Palaeolithic layers. There is a reason to believe that pigments were supplied by the alluvium of the Kuchuk-Karasu River, remote from the site at a minimal distance of a few tens of meters. Items in the collection are mostly fragmented and demonstrate numerous signs of secondary processing. The fact of the presence in the Middle Palaeolithic layers of Prolom II of a rather numerous series of artificially ground fragments of mostly soft ocher, found near the site and intentionally brought to it, as a minimum, attests to a certain interest of the Neanderthals to natural pigments. Natural pigments do not belong to the number of vital items, therefore, the actions with which they were processed can not be explained by purely utilitarian causes. Layers I—III are dated radiometrically and refer to span between 23 to 41 uncalibrated radiocarbon thousands of years ago. Thus, the data we have obtained delivers new additional information to the general fund of evidence on the non-utilitarian practices of the late Neanderthals of Eastern Europe.

References

Baryshnikov, G. F. 1987. Peshchernyi medved v paleolite Kryma. Trudy Instituta zoologii AN SSSR, 168, p. 38-65.
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1977. Otchet Krymskoi paleoliticheskoi ekspeditsii za 1977 g. NA IA NANU, 1977/3.
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1981. Otchet Krymskoi paleoliticheskoi ekspeditsii za 1981 g. NA IA NANU, 1981/29.
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1986. Akkaiskaia musterskaia kultura. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
Kolosov, Yu. H. 2002. Doslidzhennia rannoho paleolitu v Skhidnomu Krymu (Kamiana industriia piznoashelskoho ta mustierskoho chasu). Kamiana doba Ukrainy, 1, p. 9-18.
Kolosov, Yu. G., Stepanchuk, V. N. 1982. Otchet Krymskoi paleoliticheskoi ekspeditsii za 1982 g. NA IA NANU, 1982/19.
Kolosov, Yu. G., Stepanchuk, V. N. 1989. Novaia mustyerskaia stoianka v grote Prolom ІІ (predvaritelnoe soobshchenie). In: Bibikov, S. N. (ed.). Kamennyi vek: pamiatniki, metodika, problemy. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, p. 61-72.
Kolosov, Yu. H., Stepanchuk, V. M. 2002. Novi radiokarbonovi daty stoianok paleolitu Krymu. Kamiana doba Ukrainy, 1, p. 18-30.
Kolosov, Yu. G., Stepanchuk, V. N., Chabai, V. P. 1985. Otchet o rabote Krymskoi paleoliticheskoi ekspeditsii v 1985 g. NA IA NANU, 1985/15v.
Kolosov, Yu. G., Stepanchuk, V. N., Chabai, V. P. 1993. Rannii paleolit Kryma. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
Stepanchuk, V. M. 2000. Vplyv syrovyny na tekhnolohiiu ta typolohiiu serednopaleolitychnykh industrii: novi metodyky i rezultaty. Arkheometriia ta okhorona istoryko-kulturnoi spadshchyny, 4, p. 87-101.
Stepanchuk, V. N. 2006. Nizhniy i sredniy paleolit Ukrainy. Chernivtsi: Zelena Bukovyna.
Stepanchuk, V. M., Kovaliukh, M. M., Plikht van der, I. 2004. Radiovuhletsevyi vik piznopleistotsenovykh paleolitychnykh stoianok Krymu. Kamiana doba Ukrainy, 5, p. 34-61.
Stepanchuk, V. M., Chabai, V. P. 1986. Pro kryterii vydilennia mikroindustrii v mustie. Arkheolohiia, 56, p. 1-14.
Chabai, V. P. 2002. Modeli vykorystannia kremianoi syrovyny ta fauny v druhomu kulturnomu shari serednopaleolitychnoi stoianky Prolom II (Krym). Zapysky Naukovoho tovarystva imeni Shevchenka, ССXLIV, p. 355-379.
Chabai, V. P. 2004. Srednii paleolit Kryma: stratigrafiia, khronologiia, tipologicheskaia variabelnost, vostochno-evropeiskii kontekst. Kyiv: Shliakh.
Bonjean, D., Vanbrabant, Y., Abrams, G., Pirson, S., Burlet, C., Di Modica, K., Otte, M., Vander Auwera, J., Golitko, M., McMillan, R., Goemaere, E. 2015. A new Cambrian black pigment used during the late Middle Palaeolithic discovered at Scladina Cave (Andenne, Belgium). Journal of Archaeological Science, 55, p. 253-265.
d’Erricо, F. 2003. The invisible frontier. A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, p. 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.10113.
d’Errico, F., Stringer, C. B. 2011. Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences, 366, p. 1060-1069. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0340.
Enloe, J. G., David, F., Baryshnikov, G. 2000. Hyenas and Hunters: Zooarchaeological Investigations at Prolom II Cave. Crimea. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 5 (10), p. 310-324.
Majkic, A., Evans, S., Stepanchuk, V., Tsvelykh, A., d’Errico, F. 2017. A decorated raven bone from the Zaskalnaya VI (Kolosovskaya) Neanderthal site, Crimea. PLOS ONE, 12 (3), e0173435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173435.
Roebroeks, W., Siera, M. J., Kellberg Nielsen, T., De Loecker, D., Parés, J. M., Arps, C. E. S., Mücher, H. J. 2012. Use of red ochre by early Neandertals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109 (6), p. 1889-1894. https://doi/10.1073/pnas.1112261109
Soressi, M., d’Errico, F. 2007. Pigments, gravures, parures: les comportements symboliques controverses des Neandertaliens. In: Vandermeersch, B., Maureille, B. (eds). Les Neandertaliens Biologie et cultures. Paris: Editions du CTHS, p. 297-309.
Stepanchuk, V. 1993. Prolom II, a Middle Palaeolithic Cave Site in the Eastern Crimea with Non-Utilitarian Bone Artefacts. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 59, p. 17-37.
Stepanchuk, V. Vasilyev, S., Khaldeeva, N., Kharlamova, N., Borutskaya, B. 2017. The last Neanderthals of Eastern Europe: Micoquian layers IIIa and III of the site of Zaskalnaya VI (Kolosovskaya), anthropological records and context. Quaternary International, 428 (A), p. 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.042.
Zilhao, J. 2012. Personal ornaments and symbolism among the Neanderthals. In: Elias, S. (ed.). Origins of Human Innovation and Creativity. Elsevier B. V., p. 35-49.

Abstract views: 8
PDF Downloads: 1
Published
2018-12-22
How to Cite
StepanchukV. M., NezdoliiO. I., & VietrovD. O. (2018). NATURAL PIGMENTS IN MATERIALS OF THE MULTILAYERED MOUSTERIAN SITE OF PROLOM II. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 28(3), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2018.03.01