COULD THE PERSONS BURIED IN PEREPIATIKHA BARROW BE THE LORDS OF THE HILLFORD OF KHOTIV?


Keywords: Dnieper Right Bank Forrest-Steppe zone, Kyivan region, Early Iron Age, Scythian, Hillfort of Khotiv, Perepiatikha burial mound.

Abstract

North-West side of Forrest-Steppe zone had no high activity in historical events of the beginning of Iron Age, so the material culture of sites of these territories have had no sharp chronological rappers. They took places in aristocratic complexes just with appearance of Scythian in Middle Dnieper region. The article deals with two brilliant sites dating to the Early Scythian time — hillford of Khotiv and Perepiatikha burial mound. How is traditional and innovative on these sits divided?

The antiquities of the previous period in Central and Eastern Europe became a conservative feature in the local material culture. This is a way of building and building materials, bi-ritual burial ceremony, hand-made pottery, prestigious personal metal things of the Thracian-Illyrian type, bronze details of a traditional costume, metal and stone tools, stone dishes and crackers.

Innovation is divided into several categories. The first is the technology of fortification, which was appeared in placement of defense from the cavalry, and not only from the archers, and the emergence of new types of arrows — so called Scythian, which in fact became a forced import. In other words, innovation in technology relates to the sphere of warfare. The second category is import. Early imports are associated with the antiquities of the North Caucasus, the Middle East and Asia Minor (Khotiv’s predator, griffins from Perepiatikha, bronze mirrors, geshire and paste beads), which can be called jewelry and toilet items on the whole, that is, luxury items. Late imports connected with Greek policies. These are amphorae — containers of wine or other products, willing fineware and cooking pottery, which in general can be called consumer goods.

Both types of innovation are generally associated with adoption or inventing, as well as getting through trade of new things or technologies that are not associated with the massive migration of carriers of innovation features. At the same time, traditional features show that the ethnic characteristics of the population of the region are not unchanged at the time of being of both sits — hillfort of Khotiv and the funeral complex of Perepiatikha.

References

Antonovich, V. B. 1879. O mestopolozhenii drevnego Kiіevskogo Zvenigoroda. Chteniya Nauchnogo Obshchestva Nestora Letopistsa. Kiev, 1, s. 37-43.
Bessonova, S. S. 1994. K voprosu ob еtnicheskoy spetsifike kurgana Perepіatikha. In: Drevneyshiіe obshchnosti zemledeltsev i skotovodov Severnogo Prichernomoria V tys. do n. e. — V tys. n. e. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi arkheologicheskoi konferentsii (Tiraspol, 10—14 oktiabria). Tiraspol: b. i, s. 168-171.
Bessonova, S. S. 2001. Kurhany rann’oskifskoho chasu na Kyivshchyni. Pres-muzei. Arkheolohichni pam’iatky Fastivshchyny, 10—11, s. 67-69.
Boltryk, Yu., Ihnachak, M., Lifantii, O., Shelekhan, O. 2015. Rohovi elementy vuzdy z Severynivskoho horodyshcha. Naukovi studii, 8: Davni maisterni ta vyrobnytstvo u Vislo-Dniprovskomu rehioni, s. 222-245.
Vysotskała, T. N. 1979. Neapol’ — stolitsa gosudarstva pozdnikh skifov. Kiеv: Naukova dumka.
Vitruviy Pollion, Mark. 1936. Desyat’ knig ob arkhitekture. Per. F. A. Petrovskogo. Moskva: Inostrannała literatura.
Voronina, V. L. 1964. Iz istorii sredneaziatskoy fortifikatsii. Sovetskaya arheologiya, 2, s. 40-54.
Gavriliuk, N.O. 2005. Retc.: Skoryi S.A. Skify v Dneprovskoy Pravoberezhnoy Lesostepi (problem dydeleniya iranskogo etnokulturnogo elementa), Arheologiya, 3, s. 101-110.
Daragan, M.N. 2005. Antichnała keramika iz Khotovskogo gorodishcha skifskoy epokhi. In: Zuyev, V. Yu. (ed.). Bosporskiy fenomen. Problema sootnosheniіa pismennykh i arkheologicheskikh istochnikov. Sankt-Peterburg: Gosudarstvennyi Ermitazh, s. 256-261.
Daragan, M. N. 2001. Nachalo rannego zheleznogo veka v Dneprovskoy Pravoberezhnoy Lesostepy, Kiev: KNT.
Drevnosti.1846. Drevnosti, izdannye vremennoiu komisiieiu dlia razbora drevnikh aktov. Kiev: Litografiya І.Valbnera.
Zaytsev, Іu. P., Mordvіntseva, V. I. 2004. Varvarskiіe pogrebeniіa Kryma II v. do n. e. — I v. n. e. Sarmatskiіe kultury Evrazii: problemy regionalnoy khronologii. Doklady k 5 Мezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Problemy sarmatskoy arkheologii i istorii», s. 174-204.
Ivakin, G.Іu., Daragan, M. N., Orlіuk, M. I., Kravchenko, E. A., Kupriy, S. A. 2005. Geofizicheskiіe i arkheologicheskiіe issledovaniіa Khotovskogo gorodishcha skifskoy epokhi. Arkheologіchnі vіdkrittya v Ukrayinі 2004 r., s. 400-406.
Klochko, L. S. 1986. Rekonstruktsióa konusopodibnykh holovnykh uboriv skif’ianok. Arkheolohiia, 56, s. 14-24.
Klochko, L. S., Vasina, Z. O. 2002. Zhinochyi kostуum naselennóa Lisostepovoho Pravoberezhzhia u skifskyi chas (Kyievo-Cherkaskyi rehion). In: Tolochko, P. P. (ed.). Suchasni problemy arkheolohii. Kyiv: b. v., s. 92-94.
Kovpanenko, H. T. 1981. Kurhany ranneskyfskoho vremeni v basseine r. Ros’. Kiеv: Naukova dumka.
Kravchenko, E. A. 2017а. Dzherelna baza do vyvchennia Khotivskoho horodyshcha. In: Kravchenko, E. A. (ed.). Khotivske horodyshche (novitni doslidzhennia). Kyiv: IA NANU, s. 13-52.
Kravchenko, E. A. 2017b. Syrovyna, znariaddia i pytannia vyrobnytstva. In: Kravchenko, E. A. (ed.). Khotivske horodyshche (novitni doslidzhennia). Kyiv: IA NANU, s. 53-60.
Kravchenko, E. A. 2017с. Prostorova kharakterystyka: spetsialnyi prostir — pleminnyi prostir — etnichnyi prostir. In: Kravchenko, E. A. (ed.). Khotivske horodyshche (novitni doslidzhennia). Kyiv: IA NANU, s. 115-124.
Kravchenko, E. 2017d. Khotivske horodyshche: spetsialnyi prostir — pleminnyi prostir — etnichnyi prostir. Naukovi zapysky, 10: Osvoiennia prostoru: zhytlo, poselennia, rehion, p. 76-84.
Kubyshev, A. I., Skyba, A. Ye., Skoryi, S. A. 1995. Pokhovannia skifskoho chasu Pyrohivskoho mohylnyka. Arkheolohiia, 1, s. 100-111.
Lуsenko, S. D. 2004. Pogrebeniya skifskogo vremeni Malopolovetskogo mogilnika. Press-muzey. Arkheologіchnі pam’yatky Fastіvshchyny, 20—21, s. 6-33.
Manigda, O. V., Rud’, V. S. 2017. Topohrafichna zyomka horodyshcha rannioho zaliznoho viku v s. Hotiv. In: Kravchenko, E. A. (ed.). Hotivs’ke horodyshche (novitni doslidzhennia). Kyiv: IA NANU, p. 142-148.
Murzin, V. Yu., Rolle, R. 1996. Skifs’ki mista u Lisostepu (do postanovky pytannia). In: Suprunenko, O. B. (ed.). Bil’s’ke gorodyshche v konteksti vyvchennia pam’yatok rann’ogo zaliznogo viku Yevropy. Poltava: Arheologiya, s. 181-182.
Petrovskaya, Ye. A. 1966. Otchet o raskopkah Hotovskogo gorodishcha za 1965 g. NA IA NANU, f. 64, 1965—1966/19.
Petrovskaya, Ye. A. 1967. Raskopki na Khotovskom gorodishche. Arkheologicheskiye issledovaniya na Ukraine v 1965—1966 gg., s. 106-109.
Petrovskaya, Ye. A. 1968а. Raskopki na Khotovskom gorodishche. Arkheologicheskiye issledovaniya na Ukraine v 1967 g., s. 112-113.
Petrovska, Ye. O. 1968b. Kurhan VI st. do n. e. bilia s. Mala Ofirna na Kyivshchyni. Arkheolohiia, XXI, s. 164-174.
Peftyts, D. M. 2017. Keramichnyi posud i problema henezy kultury. In: Kravchenko, E. A. (ed.). Khotivske horodyshche (novitni doslidzhennia). Kyiv: IA NANU, s. 69-89.
Pokrovskaya, Ye. F. 1947. Dnevnik raboty razvedyvatelnoy gruppy ekspeditsii «Bolshoy Kiev» za vremya s 20.07 po 03.08.1947 g. NA ІA NANU, f. 64, 1947/27.
Pokrovskaya, Е. F. 1948. Otchet o raskopkakh u gorodishcha u s. Khotov v 1948 g. NA ІA NANU, f. 64, 1948/8.
Polidovych, Yu. B. 2017. Plastyna iz zobrazhenniam hyzhaka u skifs’komu zvirynomu styli. In: Kravchenko, E. A. (ed.). Hotivs’ke horodyshche (novitni doslidzhennia). Kyiv: IA NANU, p. 91-95.
Rybalova, V. D. 1961. O sviaziakh Pravoberezhnoy lesostepnoy Ukrainy s Tsentralnoy Evropoy v epokhu pozdney bronzy i rannego zheleza. In: Gaydukevich, V. F. (ed.). Issledovaniia po arkheologii SSSR. Leningrad: LGU, s. 80-95.
Serheieva, M. S. 2017. Antrakolohichni doslidzhennia. In: Kravchenko, E. A. (ed.). Khotivske horodyshche (novitni doslidzhennia). Kyiv: IA NANU, s. 104-106.
Skoryi, S. A. 1990. Kurhan Perepiatikha (do etnokulturnoi istorii Dniprovskoho Lisostepovoho Pravoberezhzhia). Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
Skoryi, S. A. 2002. Plemena Vostochnoevropeyskoy Lesostepi v skifskuyu epohu. In: Murzin, V. Yu., Toshchev, G. N. (eds.). Velikaya Skifiya (kurs lektsiy). Kiev; Zaporozh`ye, s. 69-74.
Sokolskiy, N. I. 1971. Derevoobrabatіvayushcheie remeslo v antichnіkh gosudarstvakh Severnogo Prichernomoria. Moskva: Nauka.
Terenozhkin, O. I. 1954. Kurhan bilia s. Hlevakha. Arkheolohiia, IX, s. 80-97.
Fabritsius, I. 1947. Otchet o rekognastsirovochnoy poiezdke v s.s. Khotov (Khotіv) i Khodosovka (Khodosiyevka) po zadaniiu ekspeditsii «Bolshoy Kiev» (11.06.1947 g.). NA ІA NANU, f. 64, 1947/27.
Shelekhan, O. V. 2017. Vyrobiy z metalu і piytannya khronologії Gorodyshcha. In: Kravchenko, E. A. (ed.). Khotіvske gorodуshche (novіtnі doslіdzhennya). Kyiv: IA NANU, s. 61-68.
Shramko, B. A. 1972а. Belskoіe gorodishche — vazhneyshiy politicheskiy i ekonomicheskiy tsentr skifskoy epokhi v Vostochnoy Evrope. Tezisy doklada na XV konferentsii Instituta arkheologii AN USSR, s. 22-25.
Shramko, B. A. 1972b. Raboty v basseyne Vorskly i Severskogo Dontsa. Arkheologicheskie otkrytiia 1971 g., s. 328-329.
Shramko, B. A. 1975. Nekotoryie itogi raskopok Belskogo gorodishcha i gelono-budinskaia problema. Sovetskaya arheologiya, 1, s. 65-85.
Orlandos, A. 1968. Les matériaux de construction et la technique architecturale des anciens Grecs. Paris.
Zanoci, A. 2015. Tipology and evolution of gates and access into early hallstattian fortress in Tisa-Dniester space. Tiragetia, IX (XXIV): 1, p. 7-29.

Abstract views: 30
PDF Downloads: 23
Published
2019-09-25
How to Cite
Kravchenko, E. A. (2019). COULD THE PERSONS BURIED IN PEREPIATIKHA BARROW BE THE LORDS OF THE HILLFORD OF KHOTIV?. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 32(3), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2019.03.05