PROCESSING OF ANTLER RAW MATERIALS FROM THE SETTLEMENT OF VELYKA SNITYNKA 2: SOME OBSERVATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.02.22

Keywords:

Chernyakhiv culture, Velyka Snitynka 2, craft, tools, bone-carving complex, antler processing

Abstract

The work presents the results of the author’s observations on the peculiarities of processing of raw materials and blanks for details of composite combs from the settlement of Velyka Snitynka 2 (Chernyakhiv culture, Fastiv district of Kyiv region). The paper continues and complements the publication of the bone-carving complex by B. V. Magomedov (1992). It is not a republication. The basis of the work is a collection from this complex containing about 16,500 artifacts from antler, which is stored in the Museum of Local Lore in Fastiv. The samples were examined visually, including with a magnifying glass.

The complete predominance of deer antlers was revealed in the composition of raw materials. The main way to obtain raw materials is to collect naturally discarded antler (38 against 8 specimens taken from killed animals).

Examination of samples of antler artifacts revealed traces of tools used by local craftsmen. Traces of universal tools (ax, adze, knife and utility saw) and specialized ones (at least two types of saws with small teeth, possibly special cutting tools, drill for small holes, possibly patterns for forming the backs of combs) have been watched. Presence of a heating device in the building and some processing features indicate that the antler was heat-treated to soften it.

Saws were used to transverse dissection of the antler. Functional differences between different types of saws were not found. Splitting of sawn blanks along could be done with an ax or a knife-cutter. Traces of planning of side faces to give the workpiece a rough primary shape have also been watched.

Different stages of comb making are represented by blanks (parts of beams), semi-finished products with untreated rough surface, specimens with characteristic traces of surface treatment with a cutting tool and specimens with abrasive-treated surface.

Judging by the ornamentation of the pyramidal pendants, local craftsmen also used special tools for making circular circles with a diameter of 3 and 4 mm and concentric circles with a diameter of 3 and 6 mm.

References

Abrosimova, A. A., Kaplan, N. I., Mitlianskaia, T. B. 1984. Khudozhestvennaia rezba po derevu, kosti i rogu. Moskva: Vysshaia shkola.
Bonev, S. 1988. Kostoreznoe remeslo v srednevekovom bolgarskom gorode do X v. In: Trudy V Mezhdunarodnogo Kongressa arkheologov-slavistov. 2. Kiev: Naukova dumka, s. 26-28.
Iziumova, S. A. 1949. Tekhnika obrabotki kosti v diakovskoe vremia i v Drevnei Rusi. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta istorii materialnoi kultury, 30, s. 15-25.
Kirikov, S. V. 1959. Izmeneniia zhivotnogo mira v prirodnikh zonakh SSSR: Stepnaia zona i lesostep. Moskva: AN SSSR.
Kozak, D. N., Serhieieva, M. S. 2013. Kostorizni maisterni hotiv na Volyni. Arkheolohiia, 3, s. 53-61.
Magomedov, B. V. 1988. Otchet o rabotakh Kievskogo otriada Srednedneprovskoi slavianskoi ekspeditsii v Fastovskom raione v 1988 godu. NA IA NAN Ukrainy, f. 64, 1988/12b.
Magomedov, B. V. 1989. Otchet Kievskogo otriada Srednedneprovskoi slavianskoi ekspeditsii o rabotakh v s. Velikaia Snetinka v 1989 godu. NA IA NAN Ukrainy, f. 64, 1989/3a.
Mahomedov, B. V. 1992. Velyka Snitynka 2 — poselennia hrebinnykiv III—V st. n. e. In: Pankov, S. V. (ed.). Starodavnie vyrobnytstvo na terytorii Ukrainy. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, s. 94-116.
Miadzviedzieva, V. U. 2013. Kasciareznaja vytvorčasć Polackaj ziamli IX—XIII stst. Minsk: Bielarusskaja navuka.
Oblomskii, A. M., Usachuk, A. N. 2004. Tekhnologiia izgotovleniia grebnei v Zamiatino-5 i Zamiatino-8 i masterskie grebenshchikov. In: Oblomskii, A. M. (ed.). Ostraia Luka Dona v drevnosti. Zamiatninskii arkheologicheskii kompleks gunnskogo vremeni. Ranneslavianskii mir, 6. Moskva: IA RAN, s. 69-83.
Opasnost… 2017. Opasnost dlia turistov: v Karpatakh prosnulis medvedi. Internet izdanie UA-Reporter.com (online). Rezhim dostupu: https://ua-reporter.com/news/opasnost-dlya-turistov-v-karpatah-prosnulis-medvedi (Data zvernennia 04.07.2020).
Prokopiv, V. 2014. Osoblyvosti kostoriznoho vyrobnytstva v pershii polovyni pershoho tysiacholittia n. e. v mezhyrichchi Dnistra ta Pryp’iaty. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia Lvivskoho universytetu, 18, s. 98-110.
Radziievska, V. Ye. 1982. Obrobka kistky ta rohu v lisostepovii Skifii. Arkheolohiia, 41, s. 21-33.
Rekhachev, M. 1949. Kholmogorskaia rezba po kosti. Arkhangelsk: Arkhangelskoe obl. izdatelstvo.
Serhieieva, M., Taranenko, S. 2015. Novi doslidzhennia davnoruskoho kostoriznoho remesla na Kyivskomu Podoli. Naukovi studii, 8. s. 328-345.
Serhieieva, M. S. 2016. Davnoruska kostorizna maisternia bilia s. Deriivka. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 1 (18), s. 96-103.
Serhieieva, M. S. 2018. Kostorizne ta derevoobrobni remesla na terytorii Pivdennoi Rusi. Dysertatsiia d. i. n. Kyiv: IA NAN Ukrainy.
Timchenko, N. G. 1972. K istorii okhoty i zhivotnovodstva v Kievskoi Rusi (Srednee Podneprove). Kiev: Naukova dumka.
Kaván, J. 1980. Technologie zpracování parohovй a kostĕné suroviny. Archeologické rozhledy, 32, 3, s. 280-305.

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Sergeeva, M. S. . (2022). PROCESSING OF ANTLER RAW MATERIALS FROM THE SETTLEMENT OF VELYKA SNITYNKA 2: SOME OBSERVATIONS. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 43(2(43), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.02.22