POPULATED AREAS. THE LATEST RESEARCH METHODS AND PRACTICE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2025.03.16

Keywords:

populated area, settlements, Ovruch volost, Old Rus, medieval, geospatial, geoposition, spatial approach, continuity, heredity, degree of archaeological research.

Abstract

The paper presents the rationale for the necessity, conditions, principles, and methods in the study of Old Rus and modern historical populated areas of the annalistic Ovruch volost. Particular attention is paid to the study of the interrelationships of these populated areas from different times and the search for scientific evidence of their probable genetic heredity and historical continuity. The program and complex of methods for studying the Geoposition of old populated places includes the research at three successive levels: the settlement components of the Old Rus’ populated areas (ORPA), settlements and burial grounds in the PA, and the Old Rus’ PA as a whole. The complex of the defined and measured parameters of PA Geoposition is based on the relationship of the PA to the nearest water artery, mainly a river. Most of the measured and calculated Geoposition parameters have a range, so they are divided into minimum and maximum values. The distance to the water artery, the elevation of the PA relative to the river, and the angle of inclination of the settlement surface are defined. The type of hydrographic / topographical position of the PA is registered and the type and kind of topographical separation of the ORPA settlement components is determined. The exposure of the facade in relation to the water artery and the axis of orientation of the ORPA are ascertained. A separate block is focused to the study and parameters of spatial relations and structure of the ORPA, including the determining of the distances between the settlement and the cemetery within PA, the measuring of the height ratio of the settlement to the burial ground. The variants of topo- and hydrographic correlations between settlements and cemeteries in the Old Rus PA are also identified in the paper. The program and a set of methods for study of modern historical populated areas (MHPA) are developed and applied for the most objective identification and analysis of the spatial relationship between the ORPA and MHPA. The key is to determine the location of the ORPA in relation to the MHPA. It includes 3 main gradations: «Within», «On the border», «Outside PA». These definitions are based on the relevant parameter in the respective groups of PA. The minimum and maximum distances from the vector boundaries of MHPA to ORPA are measured. The most important parameters are the distances from the ORPA to the vectorized contour boundaries of MHPA, which are found on maps of 3 miles per inch scale of the mid-nineteenth century. The altitude correlations between the ORPA and MHPA are determined in 3 gradations: old PA above, below, at the level of MHPA. Some of the definitions are accounting statements and record the results of the analysis. Thus, the following are determined: oro-hydrographic position of the ORPA in relation to the MHPA; historical and topographic core of the MHPA; dynamics of historical oro-hydrographic development of the MHPA; as well as the altitude structure of the MHPA and its geomorphic subbase. The paper analyzes the successful testing of the design of such a comparative study, highlights some topical issues and research branches, in particular, the study of the problem of choosing the site of the primary ancient settlement and the key role of the waterway in the foundation of the old PA.

References

Antonovich, V. B. 1867. Soderzhanie aktov ob okolichnoi shliakhte. In: Antonovich, V. B. (red.). Akty o proiskhozhdenii shliakhetskikh rodov v Iugo-Zapadnoi Rossii. Arkhiv Iugo-zapadnoi Rossii, izdavaemyi vremennoi Komissiei dlia razbora drevnikh aktov, vysochaishe utverzhdennoi pri Kievskom, Podolskom i volynskom general-gubernatore. IV, I. Kiev: E. Fedorov, s. 1-62.

Beliaeva, S. A. 1986. Selishcha. In: Baran, V. D. (red.). Arkheologiia Ukrainskoi SSR. 3: Ranneslavianskii i drevnerusskii periody. Kiev: Naukova dumka, s. 396-404.

Blomkvist, E. E. 1956. Krestianskie postroiki russkikh, ukraintsev i belorusov (poseleniia, zhilishcha i khoziaistvennye stroeniia). In: Tokarev, S. A. (red.). Vostochnoslavianskii etnograficheskii sbornik. Ocherki narodnoi materialnoi kultury russkikh, ukraintsev i belorusov v XІX — nachale XX v. Trudy Instituta etnografii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaia: Novaia seriia, 31. Moskva: AN SSSR, s. 3-458.

Varankin, V. V., Pokshishevskii, V. V. 1949. Formy rasseleniia i tipy selskikh naselennykh punktov v raione srednei Angary — verkhnei Leny. Voprosy geografii, 14: Geografiia naseleniia, s. 43-74.

Vedenin, Iu. A., Kuleshova, M. E. (red.). 2004. Kulturnyi landshaft kak obieekt naslediia. Moskva; Sankt-Peterburg: Institut Naslediia; Dmitrii Bulanin.

Vitov, M. V. 1953a. O klassifikatsii poselenii. Sovetskaia etnografiia, 3, s. 27-37.

Vitov, M. V. 1953b. Poseleniia Zaonezhia v XVI—XVII vv., kak predmet etnograficheskogo izucheniia. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta etnografii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaia, XІX, s. 78-80.

Vitov, M. V. 1955. Gnezdovoi tip rasseleniia na russkom Severe v ego proiskhozhdenie. Sovetskaia etnografiia, 2, s. 27-40.

Vitov, M. V. 1962. Istoriko-geograficheskie ocherki Zaonezhia XVI—XVII vv.: iz istorii selskikh poselenii. Moskva: MGU.

Volkov, F. 1916. Etnograficheskie osobennosti ukrainskogo naroda. In: Volkov, F. K. (red.). Ukrainskii narod v ego proshlom i nastoiashchem. ІІ. Sankt-Peterburg: Obshchestvennaia polza, s. 455-647.

Kovalev, S. A. 1963. Selskoe rasselenie (geograficheskoe issledovanie). Moskva: MGU.

Kozakevych, M. Z. 1959. Typy poselen na ukrainskomu Polissi. Materialy z etnohrafii ta mystetstvoznavstva, IV, s. 24-40.

Kosven, M. O. 1951. Programma dlia sobiraniia svedenii o patronimii i strukture roda. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta etnografii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaia, XІІІ, s. 20-31.

Kruzhalin, V. I., Simonov, Iu. G., Simonova, T. Iu. 2004. Chelovek, obshchestvo, relef. Osnovy sotsialno-ekonomicheskoi geomorfologii. Moskva: Dialog kultur.

Kubiiovych, V., Kulytskyi, M. 1994. Oseli. In: Kubiiovych, V., Kuzelia, Z. (red.). Entsyklopediia ukrainoznavstva. Zahalna chastyna (Repryntne vydannia). I. Kyiv: Instytut arkheohrafii NAN Ukrainy, s. 177-183.

Kuza, A. V. 1985. Neukreplennye poseleniia. In: Kolchin, B. A. (red.). Drevniaia Rus. Gorod, zamok, selo. Arkheologiia SSSR, XV. Moskva: Nauka, s. 96-104.

Kuchera, M. P. 1975. Selyshcha. In: Dovzhenok, V. Y. (red.). Arkheolohiia Ukrainskoi RSR. 3: Rannoslov’ianskyi ta davnoruskyi period. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, s. 295-299.

Kuchera, M. P. 1984. Poseleniia Srednego Podneprovia. In: Baran, V. D. (red.). Drevnerusskie poseleniia Srednego Podneprovia. Kiev: Naukova dumka, s. 6-27.

Lebedeva, N. I., Milonov, N. P. 1950. Tipy poselenii Riazanskoi oblasti (po dokumentam Riazanskogo oblastnogo arkhiva i Nauchnogo arkhiva Riazanskogo kraevedcheskogo muzeia). Sovetskaia etnografiia, 4, s. 107-132.

Likhacheva, E. A., Timofeev, D. A. (red.). 2009. Ocherki po geomorfologii urbosfery. Moskva: Media-Press.

Makovetskii, I. V. 1962. Arkhitektura russkogo narodnogo zhilishcha. Sever i Verkhnee Povolzhe. Moskva: AN SSSR.

Mongait, O. L. 1961. Riazanskaia zemlia. Moskva: AN SSSR.

Motsia, O. P. (red.). Selo Kyivskoi Rusi (za materialamy pivdennoruskykh zemel). Kyiv: Shliakh.

Niderle, L. 2015. Slavianskie drevnosti. Moskva: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii.

Nikolskaia, T. N. 1977. Selskie poseleniia zemli viatichei. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta arkheologii AN SSSR, 150, s. 3-10.

Nikolskaia, T. N. 1981. Zemlia viatichei. K istorii naseleniia basseina verkhnei i srednei Oki v ІX—XІІІ vv. Moskva: Nauka.

Orfinskii, V. P. 1989. Vekovoi spor. Tipy planirovki kak etnicheskii priznak (na primere poselenii Russkogo Severa). Sovetskaia etnografiia, 2, s. 55-70.

Pershin, P. N. 1957. Obshchie voprosy ekonomiki planirovaniia khoziaistvennykh tsentrov kolkhozov i MTS. In: Pershin, P. N. (red.). Ekonomicheskie voprosy planirovki khoziaistvennykh tsentrov MTS i kolkhozov. Moskva: Selkhozgiz, s. 39-44.

Petrov, V. P. 1968. Podsechnoe zemledelie. Kiev: Naukova dumka.

Rusov, M. 1915. Typy silskykh selyshch v poludnevii chastyni Halychyny. Kyiv.

Rusov, M. A. 1902. Poseleniia i postroiki krestian Poltavskoi gubernii. Kharkov: Pechatnoe delo.

Saushkin, Iu. G. 1947. Geograficheskie ocherki prirody i selskokhoziaistvennoi deiatelnosti naseleniia v razlichnykh raionakh sovetskogo Soiuza. Moskva: Geografgiz.

Sedov, V. V. 1960. Selskie poseleniia tsentralnykh raionov Smolenskoi zemli (VIII—XV vv.). Materialy i issledovaniia po arkheologii SSSR, 92. Moskva: AN SSSR.

Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, V. P. 1910. Gorod i derevnia v Evropeiskoi Rossii. Zapiski Imperatorskogo russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva po otdeleniiu statistiki, X, 2. Sankt-Peterburg: V. F. Kirshbaum.

Stelmakh, H. Yu. 1964. Istorychnyi rozvytok silskykh poselen na Ukraini. Istoryko-etnohrafichne doslidzhennia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.

Tensina, I. I. 1949. Vladimirskaia Meshchera. Voprosy geografii, 14: Geografiia naseleniia, s. 107-124.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 1993. Naselennia Skhidnoi Volyni V—XIII st. n. e. (systema zaselennia, ekolohiia, hospodarstvo). Dysertatsiia kand. ist. nauk. IA NAN Ukrainy.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 2002. Ovrutskyi proekt: dosvid realizatsii kompleksnoho mizhdystsyplinarnoho vyvchennia i zberezhennia istoryko-arkheolohichnoi ta paleopryrodnoi spadshchyny serednovichnoi Ovrutskoi volosti. In: Kozak, D. N. (red.). Novi tekhnolohii v arkheolohii. Kyiv; Lviv, s. 170-176.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 2003. Systema zaselennia. Pravoberezhne Polissia. In: Motsia, O. P. (red.). Selo Kyivskoi Rusi (za materialamy pivdennoruskykh zemel). Kyiv: Shliakh, s. 4-25.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 2005a. Vklad V. P. Petrova u stanovlennia vitchyznianykh ekoloho-hospodarskykh doslidzhen slov’iano-ruskoi doby. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Filosofiia. Politolohiia, 73—75, s. 72-74.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 2005b. Doslidnytski prohramy i osoblyvosti Ovrutskoho proektu vyvchennia i zberezhennia spadshchyny serednovichnoi Ovrutskoi volosti. Naukovi zapysky z ukrainskoi istorii, 16, s. 186-194.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 2008. Serednovichna Ovrutska volost i fenomen Ovrutskoi okolychnoi shliakhty. Naukovi zapysky z ukrainskoi istorii, 20, s. 466-489.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 2010. Prostorovi ta paleoekolohichni doslidzhennia pivdennoruskykh zemel: rezultaty, novi pidkhody ta perspektyvy. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 1: Problemy davnoruskoi ta serednovichnoi arkheolohii, s. 174-206.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 2018. Rezultaty ta perspektyvy kompleksnoho istoryko-arkheolohichnoho doslidzhennia fenomenu Ovrutskoi okolychnoi shliakhty v Ovrutskomu proekti. In: Baranivskyi, V. F. (red.). Shliakhetstvo Polissia Ukrainy. Starovynni rody Ovrutskoi shliakhty. Materialy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Kyiv, 20-21 kvitnia 2018 r.). Kyiv: Interservis, s. 34-43.

Tomashevskyi, A. P. 2019. Stupin arkheolohichnoi doslidzhenosti: metodyka, praktyka, rezultaty ta perspektyvy maibutnoho. In: Chabai, V. P. (red.). I Vseukrainskyi arkheolohichnyi z’izd: materialy roboty. Kyiv: IA NAN Ukrainy, s. 77-90.

Uspenskaia, A. V., Fekhner, M. V. 1956. Poseleniia Drevnei Rusi. In: Rybakov, B. A. (red.). Ocherki po istorii russkoi derevni X—XIII vv. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo istoricheskogo muzeia, 32. Moskva: Goskultprosvetizdat, s. 7-18.

Fekhner, M. V. 1967. Zakliuchenie (derevnia Severo-Zapadnoi i Severo-Vostochnoi Rusi X—XIII vv. po arkheologicheskim dannym). In: Rybakov, B. A. (red.). Ocherki po istorii russkoi derevni X—XIII vv. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo istoricheskogo muzeia, 43. Moskva: Sovetskaia Rossiia, s. 275-280.

Chernov, S. Z. 1991. Arkheologicheskie dannye o vnutrennei kolonizatsii Moskovskogo kniazhestva XІІІ—XV vv. i proiskhozhdenie volostnoi obshchiny. Sovetskaia arkheologiia, 1, s. 112-133.

Shcherban, V. K. 1980. Landshaft kak gradoobrazuiushchii faktor. Stroitelstvo i arkhitektura, 3, s. 7-9.

Iushko, A. A. 1991. Moskovskaia zemlia ІX—XІV vekov. Moskva: Nauka.

Yakovenko, N. 1994. Ukraina arystokratychna: henealohichni novely. In: Rusyna, O. V. (uporiad.). Na perelomi: druha polovyna XV — persha polovyna XVI st. Kyiv: Ukraina, s. 301-343.

Yakovenko, N. 2009. Ukrainska shliakhta z kintsia XIV do seredyny XVII stolittia. Volyn i tsentralna Ukraina. Kyiv: Krytyka.

Bintliff, J. 1992. Interaction between Archaeological Sites and Geomorphology. Cuaternario у Geomorfología, 6, p. 5-20.

Clarke, D. L. 1968. Analytical Archaeology. London: Methuen.

Gradmann, R. 1901. Das mitteleuropäische Landschaftsbild nach seiner geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Geographische Zeitschrift, 7, s. 361-377.

Gradmann, R. 1913. Das ländliche Siedlungswesen des Königreichs Württemberg. Stuttgart: J. Engelhorn.

Grimm, P. 1957. Zur Frage der Konstanz von frühgeschichtlichen Siedlungen. Ausgrabungen und Funde. Nachrichtenblatt für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, 2, s. 97-104.

Higgs, E. S. 1975. Site Catchment Analysis: A Concise Guide to Field Methods. In: Higgs, E. S. (ed.). Palaeoeconomy. London: Cambridge University, p. 223-284.

Kobyliński, Z. 1986. Koncepcja «terytorium eksploatowanego przez osadę» w archeologii brytyjskiej i jej implikacje badawcze. Archeologia Polski, XXXI, 1, s. 7-30.

Niewęgłowski, A. 1974. Perspektywy zastosowania metody mikrogeograficznej w badaniach okresów lateńskiego i rzymskiego w Polsce. Archeologia Polski, XIX, 1, s. 235-246.

Persowski, F. 1927. Osady na prawie ruskiem, polskiem, niemieckiem i wołoskiem w ziemi lwowskiej. Studjum z dziejów osadnictwa. Lwów: Kasa im. Rektora J. Mianowskiego.

Persowski, F. 1931. Osadnictwo w dorzeczu średniego biegu Sanu. Próba rekonstrukcji krajobrazu z XV wieku. In: Studja z historji społecznej i gospodarczej poświęcone prof. dr. Franciszkowi Bujakowi. Lwów: Drukarniai Naukowa, s. 83-99.

Plancouard, R. L. 1895. La forêt royale d’Artie-en-Vexin: délimitée comparativement au XVe siècle et à l’époque actuelle. Bulletin de géographie historique et descriptive, p. 339-378.

Rydzewski, J. 1986. Przemiany stref zasiedlenia na wyżynach lessowych zachodniej Małopolski w epoce brązu i żelaza. Archeologia Polski, XXXI, 1, s. 125-194.

Szulc, H. 1995. Morfogeneza osiedli wiejskich w Polsce. Prace Geograficzne, 163. Wrocław: Continuo.

Wächter, B. 1963. Zur Frage der Besiedlungskontinuität in Teillandschaften. Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte, 47, s. 57-80.

Wójcik, M. 2012. Geografia wsi w Polsce. Studium zmiany podstaw teoretyczno-metodologicznych. Łódź: Uniwersytet Łódzki.

Wójcik, M. 2013. Przemiany społeczno-przestrzenne osiedli wiejskich. Studium przypadku Łódzkiego Obszaru Metropolitalnego. Łódź: Uniwersytet Łódzki.

Zaborski, B. 1926. O kształtach wsi w Polsce i ich rozmieszczeniu. Prace Komisji Etnograficznej Polskiej Akademii Umiejętności, 1. Kraków: Gebethner i Wolff.

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Tomashevskyi А. (2024). POPULATED AREAS. THE LATEST RESEARCH METHODS AND PRACTICE. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, (3(56), 254–281. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2025.03.16